Virtually, one's talent and skill of the art, writings, and professional works create notability and fame, not Wikipedia whereas, it publishes only information, mostly poor and unauthentic. It defames and humiliates and spread false and fake information shamelessly. I predict that Wikipedia will disappear or become invaluable as criminals, mafia, and scoundrels website since its contributors demand money, sex, and such other evil and filthy needs crazy ones fall in it, thinking that the website will create fame for them, which contradicts that. The Google search should prefer reliability and notability than a rubbish website that carries the worst and ignorant contributors, even children and child-minded who play there as building the sand houses and breaking that for their pleasure. Moreover, Conservapedia's contributors qualify fairness and knowledge of the encyclopedia's credibility, and it also forbids fools, idiots, and mafia groups, which on Wikipedia every second stay haunting others and busy to spoil work of experienced ones. The English Wikipedia is a notable website or Conservapedia Encyclopedia it describes to consider it easily that Conservapedia establishes accuracy, neutrality, honesty, and standards within its scope regardless of conspiracies, financial interests, and distinctions. Naturally, I stay an excellent friend of mine than whoever else since I feel the joy of fame with notability, no matter whatever it levels and ranges it needs not a certificate. Factually, the number of votes may give fame however, it doesn't show notability whereas, literary, academic, and such figures' reviews establish notability as its precise context. The vote is a democracy it doesn't establish notability it gives power. Before becoming a notable writer, one studies and reads the classic and academic writings to qualify such a level of notability and authenticity.
0 kommentar(er)
